Smooth riding 9 footer that rides steep waves too?

Glide&Flow

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2021
163
299
CenCoastCa
liddle pathfinder

This one has my blood pumping, but price has my blood boiling...

 

DanSan

Well-Known Member
Jun 7, 2012
3,473
3,206
Soquel,CA
Gonna go with this instead of the Venor
209DF0E0-786B-4C75-A8FF-4E24E7FA8651.png
 

Wax

New Member
Feb 4, 2023
11
16
Maine
I agree about the nose on the Parallax, I’ve got a 9’3 (it was the first Thunderbolt I bought) great board - my only complaint is that the nose is a liability in Strong offshores. I actually prefer the 8’3” version- still a wide nose but the shorter length makes it easier to deal with the wind

To the OP, I just recently picked up a TJ Pro V. I’ve only had a single session on it (hooded suit, gloves , boots etc) it was about head high, hollow beach break- board worked really well. Might want to look at that as well.

BTW measuring the fin placements, I was really surprised to see how far up the sides are , about 17 inches IIRC. Really responsive!
+1 in the TJ Pro. I’ve owned two of them and they’re very capable boards. Can catch slop or handle big steep waves. I’ve not surfed the TJ Pro V yet which appears to have less rocker. Having a flatter board will make it tougher in the steep fast days the board shines in
 

JTS

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2005
251
273
Wax, I’ve never ridden the TJ Pro but have heard good things about it.

I know in the marketing stuff Taylor says they toned down the rocker in the Pro V to extend the range in more everyday waves, to be honest the session I had it was working fine in hollow beach breaks (1 session is hard to really determine) to my untrained eye it is not flat rockered. I actually was thinking it has more rocker than I expected. When I get some time I’ll measure and compare to my Proctor HPLB ,

It does have a lot of concave through the bottom which might’ve been added as a way to flatten the rocker while padding?
 

Wax

New Member
Feb 4, 2023
11
16
Maine
Wax, I’ve never ridden the TJ Pro but have heard good things about it.

I know in the marketing stuff Taylor says they toned down the rocker in the Pro V to extend the range in more everyday waves, to be honest the session I had it was working fine in hollow beach breaks (1 session is hard to really determine) to my untrained eye it is not flat rockered. I actually was thinking it has more rocker than I expected. When I get some time I’ll measure and compare to my Proctor HPLB ,

It does have a lot of concave through the bottom which might’ve been added as a way to flatten the rocker while padding?
Tj pro had a lot of rocker. You gotta work to get it moving, but once you do it’s very capable. I fiend of mine has had both. I think you’re right that the pro v is a better board for broader conditions and the original tj pro excels when there is some size
 




Top